Krautspace/coding-corner
Archived
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

euler87: const statt let für limit nutzen

Browse source 
Die Variable soll sich nie ändern, weshalb const besser ist.
This commit is contained in:
Jörg Sommer 2017-03-17 15:22:01 +01:00
parent 6987013290
commit 18a6fd4a17
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
2017-03-14/jo-so_euler87_func.js
View file

@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Array.prototype.cross = function (other, op) {
// print([1, 2].cross([3, 4], (a, b) => a + b)); // print([1, 2].cross([3, 4], (a, b) => a + b));
let primeNumbers = [2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19]; let primeNumbers = [2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19];
let limit = 5e7; const limit = 5e7;
for (let num = primeNumbers[primeNumbers.length - 1] + 2; for (let num = primeNumbers[primeNumbers.length - 1] + 2;
num <= Math.sqrt(limit); num += 2) { num <= Math.sqrt(limit); num += 2) {

2
2017-03-14/jo-so_euler87_iterator.js
View file

@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ let primeNumbers;
// print(Array.from(function* () { for (let x of primeNumbers()) { if (x > 50) return; yield x; } }())); // print(Array.from(function* () { for (let x of primeNumbers()) { if (x > 50) return; yield x; } }()));
let limit = 5e7; const limit = 5e7;
function* pnPower(exp) { function* pnPower(exp) {
for (let e of primeNumbers()) { for (let e of primeNumbers()) {